From 406da06574850b3f616fd796cd32026141362afc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anne Nicolas Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 14:06:59 +0000 Subject: add private mails from council and board on wobo demand --- ... - 2012-05-18 1955.eml | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 117 insertions(+) create mode 100644 board-private-mandriva-2012-archive/Re: [board-private] mandriva, foundation, business server - nicolas vigier - 2012-05-18 1955.eml (limited to 'board-private-mandriva-2012-archive/Re: [board-private] mandriva, foundation, business server - nicolas vigier - 2012-05-18 1955.eml') diff --git a/board-private-mandriva-2012-archive/Re: [board-private] mandriva, foundation, business server - nicolas vigier - 2012-05-18 1955.eml b/board-private-mandriva-2012-archive/Re: [board-private] mandriva, foundation, business server - nicolas vigier - 2012-05-18 1955.eml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d880ee2 --- /dev/null +++ b/board-private-mandriva-2012-archive/Re: [board-private] mandriva, foundation, business server - nicolas vigier - 2012-05-18 1955.eml @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ +Delivered-To: ennael1@gmail.com +Received: by 10.76.82.164 with SMTP id j4csp20161oay; + Fri, 18 May 2012 10:55:45 -0700 (PDT) +Received: by 10.180.84.193 with SMTP id b1mr3752144wiz.11.1337363745012; + Fri, 18 May 2012 10:55:45 -0700 (PDT) +Return-Path: +Received: from alamut.mageia.org (alamut.mageia.org. [212.85.158.146]) + by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o5si12408459wee.1.2012.05.18.10.55.44; + Fri, 18 May 2012 10:55:44 -0700 (PDT) +Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org designates 212.85.158.146 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.85.158.146; +Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org designates 212.85.158.146 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org +Received: by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix, from userid 486) + id 4960A44700; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:55:44 +0200 (CEST) +Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51CA044700 + for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:55:42 +0200 (CEST) +X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mageia.org +Received: from alamut.mageia.org ([127.0.0.1]) + by localhost (alamut.mageia.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) + with ESMTP id ZiO1x8NxLp7y for ; + Fri, 18 May 2012 19:55:41 +0200 (CEST) +Received: from mx1.mars-attacks.org (invaders.mars-attacks.org [88.191.83.84]) + by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E9D421D7 + for ; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:55:41 +0200 (CEST) +Received: by mx1.mars-attacks.org (Postfix, from userid 500) + id AB7D2280874E; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:55:39 +0200 (CEST) +Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:55:39 +0200 +From: nicolas vigier +To: Romain d'Alverny +Cc: board-private@ml.mageia.org +Message-ID: <20120518175539.GT21938@mars-attacks.org> +References: +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 +Content-Disposition: inline +In-Reply-To: +User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) +Subject: Re: [board-private] mandriva, foundation, business server +X-Loop: board-private@ml.mageia.org +X-Sequence: 52 +Errors-to: board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org +Precedence: list +Precedence: bulk +Sender: board-private-request@ml.mageia.org +X-no-archive: yes +List-Id: +List-Help: +List-Subscribe: +List-Unsubscribe: +List-Post: +List-Owner: +List-Archive: + +On Fri, 18 May 2012, Romain d'Alverny wrote: + +> Hi everyone, +> +> so, Anne and me got in a conf call with JM Croset a few minutes ago to +> get a status. +> +> He announced yesterday (Thursday, May 18) +> http://blog.mandriva.com/en/2012/05/17/mandriva-linux-will-return-to-the-community/ +> . So several discussions are popping up here and there. Mageia's +> position has been transferred to some people inside Mandriva, among +> which Peroyvind (see +> https://forums.mageia.org/en/viewtopic.php?p=18041#p18041 - although +> he doesn't have the full story it seems). +> +> He will announce early next Monday (22) that Mandriva SA will use +> Mageia as a tech platform for its business server line, and contribute +> back. Antoine Ginies (Mandriva engineer in chief for the business +> server) will get in touch with us to see how we do this technically. +> +> He worries that trolls and discussions may damage Mageia in the coming +> days (for both news: Mandriva using Mageia as a tech platform for its +> Business Server line; and Mageia not following Mandriva in its +> foundation things) because he realizes that... community stuff +> sometimes goes out of hand; but he reassured us that, whatever is +> said, he does mean good for everyone; so it's important to play it +> cool and neutral on our side too. +> +> So, here's a suggested plan: +> +> * we announce/explicit both news on our side on Monday early morning +> (CEST) as well, in a single blog post embedding all Mandriva-related +> news: +> - on one side, Mageia is not going to join Mandriva foundation +> project (and why, cold reasons as we gave him), +> - on the other side, Mandriva is going to use Mageia as tech +> platform for its business server line (link) and contribute back. +> - this double news should make it more obvious that things are not +> so simple as "Mageia is dumping Mandriva" or "Mandriva is rebasing on +> Mageia". +> +> * this news being published Monday morning, it leaves two full days +> to propagate, before we push the Mageia 2 release news (Tuesday +> evening) - interest about Mageia will have raised a bit in the +> previous days, and this release news will hide partially the previous +> news. +> +> * until now, all this has been kept private in board-private: a) +> knowledge and decision about the foundation, and b) business server +> thing. Note that about a), people may question both the decision and +> the fact that it was private, without consulting the Council. We will +> mail privately Council members to inform them about both a) and b), +> but still. We won't need further arguments than what we explained to +> Mandriva, and what the governance says. But still again. In the case +> of things getting really ugly in the coming weeks, I'd suggest that we +> call for a vote of confidence to make things very clear (from Council, +> or from all registered contributors in LDAP). + +This looks like a good plan. + +I suggest starting the blog post on piratepad. Then sending a first +draft of the blog post tomorrow (or when we have something ready) to +council members to inform them about it and see what they think of it. + -- cgit v1.2.1